Archive for the ‘Cruises’ Category

Holiday perils

This is a sad story:

Sint Maarten jet engine blast kills New Zealand woman

I’ve no idea if the woman who died was a cruise passenger or not, though probably not. But like many others I’ve looked at the YouTube videos of planes landing and taking off from the airfield on Sint Maarten. First just to see how low over the beach the aircraft were as they seemed to float into their landing, then later, I’ll admit, watching people standing in the jet exhausts as the planes took off. I was always aware, of course, that it had to be dangerous, but hearing the shouts of excitement on the YouTube videos somehow negated the obvious risks. “That must be exciting!” I probably thought.

This story is a tragic reminder that danger must never be ignored no matter how exciting it might look. As I say, this accident may well not have been to someone who was on a cruise but there are plenty of activities that cruise passengers undertake that could be dangerous. Please, everyone, take care.

Advertisements

Read Full Post »

We all know that P&O are due to get a new ship in 2020. What’s often forgotten is that this new ship will be one of half-a-dozen or so on the same hull and therefore with broadly the same facilities, and these will ships will be distributed around the various Carnival Corp fleets. The first two will go to AIDA and Costa, and they’ll be in service in 2019, which means that details of the facilities for those ships at least will have to be become visible fairly soon.

So here’s a YouTube video animation of the AIDA ship. It’s quite short, very glitzy and I’m sure that the P&O ship won’t have the same details, certainly not configurable details – e.g. a bar here, a restaurant there – but the broad outlines will be the same. To that end, I was pleased to see what looks very much like an external promenade one deck above the boat deck.

More details in due course, of course.

(Many thanks to ‘danielundecided’ who posted the link to the YouTube video on Cruise critic, which is how I found it.)

Read Full Post »

Oriana at the Amsterdam cruise terminal, 2012

I’ve read a story that suggests that the city of Amsterdam is considering a building new cruise terminal further away from the city centre than the the present one.

I’m sure that many of my readers will have visited Amsterdam on a cruise and will be familiar with the cruise terminal there. It’s quite handily-placed – you can walk from there into the heart of the city. I’ve always reckoned that it takes about 10 minutes or so to get as far as Centraal station (from where trams can be caught) or a few minutes more than that to get to Dam Square. So as long as you’re active, the current cruise terminal is very handily placed.

So why is Amsterdam considering doing this? City officials are worried about the capacity of the city to take further visitors, and they’re looking at the future (this is at least five years away, btw).  The city planners are looking to a time when not only will more ships be calling at the city but they will be bigger, and that this could increase congestion. Apparently the locks at the North Sea end of the NordSee canal – the route into Amsterdam – will be widened in the coming years, possibly to the point where they can accommodate an Oasis-class ship. The planners’ aim is to make Amsterdam city centre a destination for arriving cruise passengers, and not necessarily the destination.

Well, it’s a nice thought and I understand their motivation. Amsterdam is after all a living commercial city, it’s not just a tourist destination. Indeed, arguably tourism should come second to the city’s business which has always been – well, ‘business’. But I’m not sure how successful they’ll be. We’ve been to Amsterdam a few times, and while it’s true that on our last visit we did an excursion away from the city, that was on the second day of the visit; on the first day (or afternoon) we headed straight into the city – had the usual walk around and then found a bar somewhere near Rembrandtplein, if I remember correctly. I have a feeling that walking the canals, visiting the museums, and enjoying a drink will always the No. 1 attraction of Amsterdam. At least from the current cruise terminal we could walk to a point where we could pick up public transport. If a new terminal is any distance out, special arrangements will have to be made to get people into the city centre, and I really don’t think Amsterdam could handle a fleet of shuttle buses every time there’s a big cruise ship in port.

But it’s interesting that the city is considering this. We’ve begun to hear about restrictions on cruise passengers, of one sort or another, from a range of ports around Europe. Venice has already done it, and there was talk about Santorini also restricting the daily passenger load. I have a feeling that it’s inevitable. It would be really interesting to get the figures for the numbers of cruise passengers calling at these popular places 20 years ago and compare them with the figures for today. I think we’d be shocked by how much they’re increased – I wouldn’t be surprised if the average daily passenger load in the popular spots has increased three- or four-fold that time.

Read Full Post »

There are various stories swirling around about the problems that these two lines seems to be experiencing. Both were due to embark passengers on cruises in the next few days – Swan Hellenic (SH) on 3 January from Marseilles, and Voyages of Discovery (VoD) on 4 January from Malaysia – but both cruises have been cancelled and passengers informed. In both cases “operational reasons” are stated as being the cause of the cancellations. There are also reports from passengers booked on subsequent cruises that these, too, have been cancelled. Finally, there are rumours that the two lines may be going out of business, with some sketchy reports of possible buyers for at least one of the ships being shown over it.

The ships themselves seem to be sailing without problems – as I write this SH’s Minerva is en route from Barcelona to Marseilles – so that’s not the “operational reason” involved. Indeed, given that these are two different ships on different sides of the earth, it was always unlikely that technical problems with the ships were the “operational reasons”. However there are connections between the two lines in that they are both owned by, or are part of, the All Leisure Group (ALG).

ALG own other holiday and cruise companies, including Travelsphere and Hebridean Island Cruises. There are reports from customers of Travelsphere that they have received a letter advising them of changes to their forthcoming holidays in that the holidays will now be provided by Page & Moy, a different company altogether. As a result of all these developments it is being suggested that All Leisure Group may simply be going out of business, with some parts of the company being transferred to new owners and other parts not being transferred. But at the moment this is all speculation – all we know for certain is that the new year cruises for SH and VoD have been cancelled.

When I’ve been looking for cruises to book for ourselves I’ve looked at both of these lines and they did look attractive, in terms of the itinerary. However I also felt there were downsides. The two ships – Minerva (SH) and Voyager (VoD) – are both very small, at 12,321 tons for Minerva and 15,271 tons for Voyager. Additionally, I had read reviews that suggested that the on-board quality wasn’t great – that the all-inclusive nature of the cruises was achieved with lowest-common-denominator selections of beers and wines, for example; that cabins were very small; and that (being small) there was a lot of movement while at sea. These rather negative reports, along with the rather high prices, were why I never booked with either of these lines. That said, I also read glowing reviews from  other passengers, especially about the itineraries, shore-side activities, and the on-board lecture programmes.

At one time it looked as if Swan Hellenic was carving a very respectable niche for itself. In 2003 the original (and current) Minerva was replaced by a different ship, imaginatively called ‘Minerva II’. This was in fact one of the R ships, and at that time most were still tied up at various ports following the collapse in late 2001 of Renaissance Cruises who had had them built. At 30,000 tons with (almost) all-balcony accommodation there were and remain exceptional ships. Indeed, they were so exceptional that SH lost Minerva II! At that time the line was owned by P&O and was thus ultimately a part of the Carnival empire. In 2007 Carnival Corp could see a better use for Minerva II and it was transferred to Princess Cruises as Royal Princess. She didn’t last long with Princess, however – in 2011 she was further transferred to P&O and has since borne the name ‘Adonia’. Unfortunately for Swan Hellenic, the transfer to Princess of Minerva II left them without a ship, and the line closed down. It was re-created by Lord Sterling in 2007, and voyages recommenced in 2008 with the previous ship, Minerva. Somewhere during this period the line was acquired by All Leisure Group, which brings us up to today.

Read Full Post »

A quick post to say that the reports of Royal Princess’ just-finished refit at Fincantieri say that the main work done was the addition of a mid-ships stairwell. The absence of this has caused a number of complaints among Princess customers, and of course also among P&O customers – Britannia is a sister ship to Royal Princess.

Royal was the first of the Royal Princess class, and was followed by Regal Princess and Britannia. Majestic Princess is due to arrive in 2017 and reports say she will have a mid-ships stairwellwhen delivered.

That leaves Regal and Britannia. I assume that these ships will get the same treatment as Royal.

Here’s a link to a site carrying this news.

Read Full Post »

Apparently it’s had British owners (Star Capital Partners) since 2011. (Who knew that B+V was British-owned?)

But no more. It’s been sold to a German firm already active in the same markets – ship repair and super-yacht construction. It’s thought that the acquisition is to increase the new owners capacity.

B+V recently did the refurbishment of QM2.

Read Full Post »

I’ve just read that Carnival Corp have placed an order with Meyer for three new 180,000 ton ships, all of them LNG fuelled. Two are for Carnival Cruises, but the third is stated to be for P&O UK. Delivery not before 2020. Here’s a link to the Press Release page on the Carnival Corp site.

More info as I get it….

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »